David Wright — 2006 Tennessee House, District 18 campaign
2006 Tennessee House, District 18
Final This campaign’s election cycle is closed — no further reports for it are due, so these totals are settled rather than mid-race. They cover every filing we hold for the campaign; if the source archive later adds one, we load it. Full definition → · 1 filing · Supplemental 2005 2005
Why this number?
Why this number?
Why this number?
Cash on hand is the amount reported on the filing listed below.
Show formula
The ending cash balance the campaign reported on its most recent filing (as filed, not computed).
- Supplemental 2005 2005 Amendment $0 filing-stated
Raised (cash) adds together the amounts listed below.
Show formula
Sum of every cash receipt bucket: itemized contributions from others + the candidate's own contributions + loans + filer-stated unitemized + (federal) transfers and other receipts.
| Candidate's own contributions | $1,500 |
| Loans received | $4,500 |
| Unitemized contributions (filer-stated lump sum) | $1,700 |
| Raised (cash) | $7,700 |
- Supplemental 2005 2005 Amendment $3,200 mixed
- Candidate's own contributions $1,500 derived
- Unitemized contributions (filer-stated lump sum) $1,700 filing-stated
Filings restate outstanding loans each period, so a loan belongs to the campaign rather than to any one filing.
Total spent adds together the amounts listed below.
Show formula
Itemized expenditure rows plus the stated spending a filer reported as a lump sum without itemizing it.
| Itemized expenditures | $3,234 |
| Total spent | $3,234 |
- Supplemental 2005 2005 Amendment $3,234 derived
Who funds this campaign The sources split breaks down everything the campaign raised: the candidate’s own money (including self-loans), individuals (including unitemized small gifts), organizations and PACs, and “other” (in-kind contributions, loans other than the candidate’s, and the like) — open its “Why this number?” for the full breakdown. Gift-size and location figures cover itemized contributions only. Aggregates count everyone who gave, including donors below the $200 disclosure floor — a share across all donors identifies no one. Full definition →
The candidate’s own money made up 58% of the campaign’s funds — individuals gave 22%, organizations and PACs 0%, with 19% from other sources.
Why this number?
Share from the candidate compares from the candidate's own money with everything the campaign raised.
Show formula
Everything the campaign raised, split into the candidate's own money (own contributions plus self- and family loans), individuals, organizations and PACs, and everything else — loans other than the candidate's, in-kind contributions, and (for federal filers) committee transfers and other receipts. Unitemized small donations count as individual money. The parts add up to the total raised. The headline share is the candidate divided by the total.
| Candidate's own money (incl. self-loans) | $4,500 |
| From individuals | $1,700 |
| Loans other than the candidate's | $1,500 |
Contributions
| Donor | Donations | Net |
|---|---|---|
| David Wright Self | 1 | $1,500.00 |
| Donor | Location | Employer | Amount | Date |
|---|
Expenditures
| Vendor | Payments | Total | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Redmond, LYNN | 1 | $1,567.00 | |
| Amsouth Bank | 1 | $1,561.69 | |
| Drinnen, Gary | 1 | $105.57 |
| Payee | Location | Purpose | Amount | Date |
|---|
Loans
$4,500.00 in loan principal shown. The filings date all of it to this campaign. Later reports can repeat an outstanding loan, so each reconstructed lender balance is counted once below.
Why this number?
Loan principal shown adds together the amounts listed below.
Show formula
Loan schedules can repeat an outstanding debt on later reports. This is the reconstructed principal for each lender, counted once, split between candidate or family loans and all other lenders. Repayments and outstanding balances are shown separately in the ledger.
| Candidate and family loans | $3,000 |
| Other lenders | $1,500 |
| Loan principal shown | $4,500 |
| Lender | Type | Received | Principal | Repaid | Outstanding |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self (David Wright) | Candidate loan | — | $3,000.00 | $3,000.00 | $0.00 |
| Amsouth Bank | Other lender | — | $1,500.00 | $1,500.00 | $0.00 |
Where the money went Each expenditure carries a short description of what it was for, written by the campaign. We sort those descriptions into a fixed set of categories; one expenditure goes in one category, so the amounts add up to David Wright’s itemized spending. Descriptions that don’t clearly fit a category are counted under Other rather than guessed at.
- Consulting & professional services $1,567 48%
- Loan & debt repayment $1,562 48%
- Contributions & donations $106 3%
Loans
| Lender | Amount | Date Received | Outstanding | Repaid |
|---|
Each loan shows its balance as of the candidate's most recent filing; repayments since then appear when the next report is filed.
Filing History
Totals as filed with the Tennessee Registry of Election Finance; see About for how this data is processed.
| Filing | Cash Beginning | Cash Ending | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplemental 2005 2005 Amended | $1,534.26 | $0.00 | Source ↗ |