Diane George — 2016 Tennessee House, District 95 campaign
2016 Tennessee House, District 95
Final This campaign’s election cycle is closed — no further reports for it are due, so these totals are settled rather than mid-race. They cover every filing we hold for the campaign; if the source archive later adds one, we load it. Full definition → · 4 filings · Pre-Primary 2016–Q4 2016
Why this number?
Why this number?
Why this number?
Why this number?
Cash on hand is the amount reported on the filing listed below.
Show formula
The ending cash balance the campaign reported on its most recent filing (as filed, not computed).
- Q4 2016 Initial $0 filing-stated
Raised (cash) adds together the amounts listed below.
Show formula
Sum of every cash receipt bucket: itemized contributions from others + the candidate's own contributions + loans + filer-stated unitemized + (federal) transfers and other receipts. Excludes the value of donated goods & services, shown separately as In-Kind Received.
| Itemized contributions from others | $5,500 |
| Loans received | $3,500 |
| Unitemized contributions (filer-stated lump sum) | $550 |
| Raised (cash) | $9,550 |
- Q4 2016 Initial $550 mixed
- Itemized contributions from others $500 derived
- Unitemized contributions (filer-stated lump sum) $50 filing-stated
- Q3 2016 Initial $1,000 derived
- Pre-Primary 2016 Initial $1,500 derived
- Q2 2016 Amendment $6,500 mixed
- Itemized contributions from others $4,000 derived
- Unitemized contributions (filer-stated lump sum) $500 filing-stated
- Loans $2,000 derived
Total spent adds together the amounts listed below.
Show formula
Itemized expenditure rows plus the stated spending a filer reported as a lump sum without itemizing it.
| Itemized expenditures | $5,902 |
| Stated spending not itemized (credited) | $148 |
| Total spent | $6,050 |
- Q4 2016 Initial $859 mixed
- Itemized expenditures $829 derived
- Stated spending not itemized (credited) $30 filing-stated
- Q3 2016 Initial $1,682 mixed
- Itemized expenditures $1,573 derived
- Stated spending not itemized (credited) $109 filing-stated
- Q2 2016 Amendment $3,509 mixed
- Itemized expenditures $3,500 derived
- Stated spending not itemized (credited) $9 filing-stated
Out-of-state share compares itemized money from outside tennessee with raised incl. in-kind.
Show formula
Itemized contributions from a state other than Tennessee, divided by everything the campaign raised (shown only when the state of most itemized money is known — above 99% coverage).
| From outside Tennessee | $0 |
Who funds this campaign The sources split breaks down everything the campaign raised: the candidate’s own money (including self-loans), individuals (including unitemized small gifts), organizations and PACs, and “other” (in-kind contributions, loans other than the candidate’s, and the like) — open its “Why this number?” for the full breakdown. Gift-size and location figures cover itemized contributions only. Aggregates count everyone who gave, including donors below the $200 disclosure floor — a share across all donors identifies no one. Full definition →
The candidate’s own money made up 34% of the campaign’s funds — individuals gave 59%, organizations and PACs 0%, with 7% from other sources.
Why this number?
Share from the candidate compares from the candidate's own money with everything the campaign raised.
Show formula
Everything the campaign raised, split into the candidate's own money (own contributions plus self- and family loans), individuals, organizations and PACs, and everything else — loans other than the candidate's, in-kind contributions, and (for federal filers) committee transfers and other receipts. Unitemized small donations count as individual money. The parts add up to the total raised. The headline share is the candidate divided by the total.
| Candidate's own money (incl. self-loans) | $3,500 |
| From individuals | $6,050 |
| In-kind contributions (goods & services) | $686 |
Where the money comes from Shares of itemized dollars, by the contributor’s state and city as filed. A city is named only when at least 5 donors gave from it or it holds at least 5% of the located dollars; everyone else is grouped into “elsewhere.” Shown only when at least 80% of dollars carry a usable state. Full definition →
100% of located dollars came from within Tennessee (0% from out of state).
- Collierville $2K41%
- The Island $1K18%
- Memphis $95017%
- Germantown $80015%
- Cordova $5009%
Why this number?
Out-of-state share of located dollars compares itemized money from outside tennessee with itemized money with a known state.
Show formula
Itemized contribution dollars from outside Tennessee, divided by all itemized dollars whose contributor state is known. A city is named only when at least 5 donors gave from it OR it holds at least 5% of the located dollars; everyone else is grouped into elsewhere-in-Tennessee and other-out-of-state. Shown only above 99% state coverage. Based on itemized contributions only (loans and money a filer reported as an unitemized lump sum are not included).
| From outside Tennessee | $0 |
Contributions & Spending Over Time
Itemized monetary contributions and expenditures by month — May 2016 – Nov 2016. Peak $2,250 in Jun 2016. Spending peaked at $1,573 in Jul 2016.
Contributions
The donor total above includes everyone who gave. This table names donors whose cumulative giving reached $200.
| Donor | Donations | Net |
|---|---|---|
| Edwin Barnett | 1 | $1,000.00 |
| James Harvey | 2 | $800.00 |
| G Hanissian | 2 | $750.00 |
| Scott Edwards | 2 | $700.00 |
| David Bradford In-Kind | 1 | $686.00 |
| Carole Hinley | 2 | $600.00 |
| Bradley Rice | 1 | $500.00 |
| Bobbi Gillis | 1 | $500.00 |
| Tim Faris | 2 | $400.00 |
| William Orgel | 1 | $250.00 |
| Donor | Location | Employer | Amount | Date |
|---|
Expenditures
| Vendor | Payments | Total | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rincon Strategy | 1 | $3,500.00 | |
| Paradigm Business Images, LLC | 1 | $1,572.93 | |
| D&D Berryhill Signs & Labels | 1 | $570.00 | |
| George, Diane | 1 | $259.42 |
| Payee | Location | Purpose | Amount | Date |
|---|
Loans
$3,500.00 in loan principal shown. The filings date all of it to this campaign. Later reports can repeat an outstanding loan, so each reconstructed lender balance is counted once below.
Why this number?
Loan principal shown adds together the amounts listed below.
Show formula
Loan schedules can repeat an outstanding debt on later reports. This is the reconstructed principal for each lender, counted once, split between candidate or family loans and all other lenders. Repayments and outstanding balances are shown separately in the ledger.
| Candidate and family loans | $3,500 |
| Loan principal shown | $3,500 |
| Lender | Type | Received | Principal | Repaid | Outstanding |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self (Diane George) | Candidate loan | May 25, 2016 | $3,500.00 | $3,500.00 | $0.00 |
Where the money went Each expenditure carries a short description of what it was for, written by the campaign. We sort those descriptions into a fixed set of categories; one expenditure goes in one category, so the amounts add up to Diane George’s itemized spending. Descriptions that don’t clearly fit a category are counted under Other rather than guessed at.
- Consulting & professional services $3,500 59%
- Advertising & media $2,402 41%
Loans
| Lender | Amount | Date Received | Outstanding | Repaid |
|---|
Each loan shows its balance as of the candidate's most recent filing; repayments since then appear when the next report is filed.
Filing History
Totals as filed with the Tennessee Registry of Election Finance; see About for how this data is processed.