Jim Summerville — 2010 Tennessee Senate, District 25 campaign
2010 Tennessee Senate, District 25
Final This campaign’s election cycle is closed — no further reports for it are due, so these totals are settled rather than mid-race. They cover every filing we hold for the campaign; if the source archive later adds one, we load it. Full definition → · 5 filings · Pre-General 2010–Q4 2010
Why this number?
Why this number?
Why this number?
Why this number?
Cash on hand is the amount reported on the filing listed below.
Show formula
The ending cash balance the campaign reported on its most recent filing (as filed, not computed).
- Q4 2010 Initial $30 filing-stated
Raised (cash) adds together the amounts listed below.
Show formula
Sum of every cash receipt bucket: itemized contributions from others + the candidate's own contributions + loans + filer-stated unitemized + (federal) transfers and other receipts.
| Itemized contributions from others | $1,700 |
| Candidate's own contributions | $700 |
| Raised (cash) | $2,400 |
- Pre-General 2010 Amendment $500 derived
- Q3 2010 Initial $1,900 derived
Total spent adds together the amounts listed below.
Show formula
Itemized expenditure rows plus the stated spending a filer reported as a lump sum without itemizing it.
| Itemized expenditures | $2,257 |
| Stated spending not itemized (credited) | $75 |
| Total spent | $2,332 |
- Pre-General 2010 Amendment $489 derived
- Q3 2010 Initial $1,843 mixed
- Itemized expenditures $1,768 derived
- Stated spending not itemized (credited) $75 filing-stated
Out-of-state share compares itemized money from outside tennessee with raised incl. in-kind.
Show formula
Itemized contributions from a state other than Tennessee, divided by everything the campaign raised (shown only when the state of most itemized money is known — above 99% coverage).
| From outside Tennessee | $0 |
Who funds this campaign The sources split breaks down everything the campaign raised: the candidate’s own money (including self-loans), individuals (including unitemized small gifts), organizations and PACs, and “other” (in-kind contributions, loans other than the candidate’s, and the like) — open its “Why this number?” for the full breakdown. Gift-size and location figures cover itemized contributions only. Aggregates count everyone who gave, including donors below the $200 disclosure floor — a share across all donors identifies no one. Full definition →
The candidate’s own money made up 29% of the campaign’s funds — individuals gave 71%, organizations and PACs 0%.
Why this number?
Share from the candidate compares from the candidate's own money with everything the campaign raised.
Show formula
Everything the campaign raised, split into the candidate's own money (own contributions plus self- and family loans), individuals, organizations and PACs, and everything else — loans other than the candidate's, in-kind contributions, and (for federal filers) committee transfers and other receipts. Unitemized small donations count as individual money. The parts add up to the total raised. The headline share is the candidate divided by the total.
| Candidate's own money (incl. self-loans) | $700 |
| From individuals | $1,700 |
Where the money comes from Shares of itemized dollars, by the contributor’s state and city as filed. A city is named only when at least 5 donors gave from it or it holds at least 5% of the located dollars; everyone else is grouped into “elsewhere.” Shown only when at least 80% of dollars carry a usable state. Full definition →
100% of located dollars came from within Tennessee (0% from out of state).
- Dickson $2K100%
Why this number?
Out-of-state share of located dollars compares itemized money from outside tennessee with itemized money with a known state.
Show formula
Itemized contribution dollars from outside Tennessee, divided by all itemized dollars whose contributor state is known. A city is named only when at least 5 donors gave from it OR it holds at least 5% of the located dollars; everyone else is grouped into elsewhere-in-Tennessee and other-out-of-state. Shown only above 99% state coverage. Based on itemized contributions only (loans and money a filer reported as an unitemized lump sum are not included).
| From outside Tennessee | $0 |
Contributions & Spending Over Time
Itemized monetary contributions and expenditures by month — Sep 2010 – Oct 2010. Peak $1,200 in Sep 2010. Spending peaked at $1,568 in Sep 2010.
Contributions
The donor total above includes everyone who gave. This table names donors whose cumulative giving reached $200.
| Donor | Donations | Net |
|---|---|---|
| Jodie Hardin | 1 | $700.00 |
| Jim Summerville Self | 1 | $700.00 |
| Charles Hampton | 1 | $500.00 |
| Alice Jane Smith | 1 | $500.00 |
| Donor | Location | Employer | Amount | Date |
|---|
Expenditures
| Vendor | Payments | Total | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sign Shop | 3 | $1,090.00 | |
| Waverly News-Democrat | 1 | $426.50 | |
| Humphreys News-Democrat | 1 | $408.00 | |
| WQMV | 1 | $270.00 | |
| Online Stores, Inc. | 1 | $62.68 |
| Payee | Location | Purpose | Amount | Date |
|---|
Where the money went Each expenditure carries a short description of what it was for, written by the campaign. We sort those descriptions into a fixed set of categories; one expenditure goes in one category, so the amounts add up to Jim Summerville’s itemized spending. Descriptions that don’t clearly fit a category are counted under Other rather than guessed at.
- Advertising & media $1,167 52%
- Printing & mail $1,090 48%
Filing History
Totals as filed with the Tennessee Registry of Election Finance; see About for how this data is processed.