Mary Parker — 2010 Tennessee Senate, District 23 campaign
2010 Tennessee Senate, District 23
Final This campaign’s election cycle is closed — no further reports for it are due, so these totals are settled rather than mid-race. They cover every filing we hold for the campaign; if the source archive later adds one, we load it. Full definition → · 2 filings · Mid-Year 2007–Year-End 2007
Why this number?
Why this number?
Why this number?
Cash on hand is the amount reported on the filing listed below.
Show formula
The opening cash balance on the campaign's most recent filing (as filed, not computed). Note: this most recent filing reports no activity yet states a $0.00 ending balance over a $842.09 opening balance — the balance likely carried forward but was not restated on the report.
- Year-End 2007 Supplemental $842 filing-stated
Raised (cash) adds together the amounts listed below.
Show formula
Sum of every cash receipt bucket: itemized contributions from others + the candidate's own contributions + loans + filer-stated unitemized + (federal) transfers and other receipts.
| Candidate's own contributions | $3,988 |
| Unitemized contributions (filer-stated lump sum) | $50 |
| Raised (cash) | $4,038 |
- Mid-Year 2007 Supplemental $4,038 mixed
- Candidate's own contributions $3,988 derived
- Unitemized contributions (filer-stated lump sum) $50 filing-stated
Total spent adds together the amounts listed below.
Show formula
Itemized expenditure rows plus the stated spending a filer reported as a lump sum without itemizing it.
| Itemized expenditures | $2,777 |
| Total spent | $2,777 |
- Mid-Year 2007 Supplemental $2,777 derived
Who funds this campaign The sources split breaks down everything the campaign raised: the candidate’s own money (including self-loans), individuals (including unitemized small gifts), organizations and PACs, and “other” (in-kind contributions, loans other than the candidate’s, and the like) — open its “Why this number?” for the full breakdown. Gift-size and location figures cover itemized contributions only. Aggregates count everyone who gave, including donors below the $200 disclosure floor — a share across all donors identifies no one. Full definition →
The candidate’s own money made up 99% of the campaign’s funds — individuals gave 1%, organizations and PACs 0%.
Why this number?
Share from the candidate compares from the candidate's own money with everything the campaign raised.
Show formula
Everything the campaign raised, split into the candidate's own money (own contributions plus self- and family loans), individuals, organizations and PACs, and everything else — loans other than the candidate's, in-kind contributions, and (for federal filers) committee transfers and other receipts. Unitemized small donations count as individual money. The parts add up to the total raised. The headline share is the candidate divided by the total.
| Candidate's own money (incl. self-loans) | $3,988 |
| From individuals | $50 |
Contributions
| Donor | Donations | Net |
|---|---|---|
| Mary A Parker Self | 1 | $3,987.65 |
| Donor | Location | Employer | Amount | Date |
|---|
Expenditures
| Vendor | Payments | Total | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| University of Buffalo | 1 | $1,500.00 | |
| Parker & Crofford | 1 | $1,277.16 |
| Payee | Location | Purpose | Amount | Date |
|---|
Filing History
Totals as filed with the Tennessee Registry of Election Finance; see About for how this data is processed.