Roger W. Griffith — 2014 Tennessee House, District 17 campaign
2014 Tennessee House, District 17
Final This campaign’s election cycle is closed — no further reports for it are due, so these totals are settled rather than mid-race. They cover every filing we hold for the campaign; if the source archive later adds one, we load it. Full definition → · 3 filings · Mid-Year 2013–Mid-Year 2014
Why this number?
Why this number?
Why this number?
Cash on hand is the amount reported on the filing listed below.
Show formula
The ending cash balance the campaign reported on its most recent filing (as filed, not computed).
- Mid-Year 2014 Supplemental $0 filing-stated
Raised (cash) adds together the amounts listed below.
Show formula
Sum of every cash receipt bucket: itemized contributions from others + the candidate's own contributions + loans + filer-stated unitemized + (federal) transfers and other receipts.
| Loans received | $15,537 |
| Unitemized contributions (filer-stated lump sum) | $8 |
| Raised (cash) | $15,545 |
- Mid-Year 2013 Supplemental $8 filing-stated
Filings restate outstanding loans each period, so a loan belongs to the campaign rather than to any one filing.
Total spent adds together the amounts listed below.
Show formula
Itemized expenditure rows plus the stated spending a filer reported as a lump sum without itemizing it.
| Itemized expenditures | $325 |
| Stated spending not itemized (credited) | $8 |
| Total spent | $333 |
- Mid-Year 2013 Supplemental $333 mixed
- Itemized expenditures $325 derived
- Stated spending not itemized (credited) $8 filing-stated
Who funds this campaign The sources split breaks down everything the campaign raised: the candidate’s own money (including self-loans), individuals (including unitemized small gifts), organizations and PACs, and “other” (in-kind contributions, loans other than the candidate’s, and the like) — open its “Why this number?” for the full breakdown. Gift-size and location figures cover itemized contributions only. Aggregates count everyone who gave, including donors below the $200 disclosure floor — a share across all donors identifies no one. Full definition →
The candidate’s own money made up 99.9% of the campaign’s funds — individuals gave 0.1%, organizations and PACs 0%.
Why this number?
Share from the candidate compares from the candidate's own money with everything the campaign raised.
Show formula
Everything the campaign raised, split into the candidate's own money (own contributions plus self- and family loans), individuals, organizations and PACs, and everything else — loans other than the candidate's, in-kind contributions, and (for federal filers) committee transfers and other receipts. Unitemized small donations count as individual money. The parts add up to the total raised. The headline share is the candidate divided by the total.
| Candidate's own money (incl. self-loans) | $15,537 |
| From individuals | $8 |
Contributions
No itemized contributions on record.
Expenditures
| Vendor | Payments | Total | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Info Marketing, Inc. | 1 | $325.00 |
| Payee | Location | Purpose | Amount | Date |
|---|
Loans
$15,867.45 in loan principal shown. $15,537.45 was borrowed in this campaign; $330.00 was carried into these filings from an earlier period. Later reports can repeat an outstanding loan, so each reconstructed lender balance is counted once below.
Why this number?
Loan principal shown adds together the amounts listed below.
Show formula
Loan schedules can repeat an outstanding debt on later reports. This is the reconstructed principal for each lender, counted once, split between candidate or family loans and all other lenders. Repayments and outstanding balances are shown separately in the ledger.
| Candidate and family loans | $15,867 |
| Loan principal shown | $15,867 |
| Lender | Type | Received | Principal | Repaid | Outstanding |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self (Roger W. Griffith) | Candidate loan | Jan 2, 2013 | $15,867.45 | $15,867.45 | $0.00 |
Loans
| Lender | Amount | Date Received | Outstanding | Repaid |
|---|
Of the $15,867 lent, $15,537 was borrowed during the filings shown here. The other $330 was drawn before them and is still listed because it has not been fully repaid — so it counts as debt this campaign owes, not as money it raised.
Each loan shows its balance as of the candidate's most recent filing; repayments since then appear when the next report is filed.
Filing History
Totals as filed with the Tennessee Registry of Election Finance; see About for how this data is processed.