Tom Neill — 2006 Tennessee Senate, District 23 campaign
2006 Tennessee Senate, District 23
Final This campaign’s election cycle is closed — no further reports for it are due, so these totals are settled rather than mid-race. They cover every filing we hold for the campaign; if the source archive later adds one, we load it. Full definition → · 4 filings · Pre-Primary 2006–Q4 2006
Why this number?
Why this number?
Why this number?
Why this number?
Cash on hand is the amount reported on the filing listed below.
Show formula
The ending cash balance the campaign reported on its most recent filing (as filed, not computed).
- Q4 2006 Initial $0 filing-stated
Raised (cash) adds together the amounts listed below.
Show formula
Sum of every cash receipt bucket: itemized contributions from others + the candidate's own contributions + loans + filer-stated unitemized + (federal) transfers and other receipts.
| Itemized contributions from others | $42,420 |
| Loans received | $134,001 |
| Raised (cash) | $176,421 |
- Pre-Primary 2006 Amendment $4,630 derived
- Q2 2006 Amendment $171,791 derived
Total spent adds together the amounts listed below.
Show formula
Itemized expenditure rows plus the stated spending a filer reported as a lump sum without itemizing it.
| Itemized expenditures | $226,562 |
| Stated spending not itemized (credited) | $476 |
| Total spent | $227,038 |
- Q3 2006 Initial $50,166 derived
- Pre-Primary 2006 Amendment $29,308 mixed
- Itemized expenditures $28,913 derived
- Stated spending not itemized (credited) $395 filing-stated
- Q2 2006 Amendment $147,563 mixed
- Itemized expenditures $147,482 derived
- Stated spending not itemized (credited) $81 filing-stated
Out-of-state share compares itemized money from outside tennessee with raised incl. in-kind.
Show formula
Itemized contributions from a state other than Tennessee, divided by everything the campaign raised (shown only when the state of most itemized money is known — above 99% coverage).
| From outside Tennessee | $6,500 |
Who funds this campaign The sources split breaks down everything the campaign raised: the candidate’s own money (including self-loans), individuals (including unitemized small gifts), organizations and PACs, and “other” (in-kind contributions, loans other than the candidate’s, and the like) — open its “Why this number?” for the full breakdown. Gift-size and location figures cover itemized contributions only. Aggregates count everyone who gave, including donors below the $200 disclosure floor — a share across all donors identifies no one. Full definition →
The candidate’s own money made up 76% of the campaign’s funds — individuals gave 24%, organizations and PACs 0%.
Why this number?
Share from the candidate compares from the candidate's own money with everything the campaign raised.
Show formula
Everything the campaign raised, split into the candidate's own money (own contributions plus self- and family loans), individuals, organizations and PACs, and everything else — loans other than the candidate's, in-kind contributions, and (for federal filers) committee transfers and other receipts. Unitemized small donations count as individual money. The parts add up to the total raised. The headline share is the candidate divided by the total.
| Candidate's own money (incl. self-loans) | $134,001 |
| From individuals | $42,420 |
Gift size Each individual donor’s total giving to this campaign this cycle. Organizations, PACs, and the candidate’s own money are excluded (this is about people); a donor who gave under several name spellings is counted once. A donor named on the page can still sit in a small bucket — these are cycle totals, not “unnamed donors.” Full definition →
Why this number?
Average gift per individual donor compares total from individual donors with individual donors.
Show formula
Every individual donor's total contributions to this campaign, divided by the number of individual donors. Organizations and PACs are excluded (this measures people); a donor who gave under several name spellings is counted once. The median and the gift-size buckets are computed over the same individual-donor totals. Based on itemized contributions only (loans and money a filer reported as an unitemized lump sum are not included).
| Total from individual donors | $42,420 |
| Median gift | $100 |
| Individual donors | 98 |
Where the money comes from Shares of itemized dollars, by the contributor’s state and city as filed. A city is named only when at least 5 donors gave from it or it holds at least 5% of the located dollars; everyone else is grouped into “elsewhere.” Shown only when at least 80% of dollars carry a usable state. Full definition →
85% of located dollars came from within Tennessee (15% from out of state).
- Franklin $14K33%
- Brentwood $11K25%
- Nashville $10K23%
- Elsewhere in Tennessee $2K
- Other out-of-state $7K
Why this number?
Out-of-state share of located dollars compares itemized money from outside tennessee with itemized money with a known state.
Show formula
Itemized contribution dollars from outside Tennessee, divided by all itemized dollars whose contributor state is known. A city is named only when at least 5 donors gave from it OR it holds at least 5% of the located dollars; everyone else is grouped into elsewhere-in-Tennessee and other-out-of-state. Shown only above 99% state coverage. Based on itemized contributions only (loans and money a filer reported as an unitemized lump sum are not included).
| From outside Tennessee | $6,500 |
Contributions & Spending Over Time
Itemized monetary contributions and expenditures by month — Apr 2006 – Sep 2006. Peak $24,660 in Jun 2006. Spending peaked at $121,612 in May 2006.
Contributions
The donor total above includes everyone who gave. This table names donors whose cumulative giving reached $200. Smaller donors contributed $4,070 total; their names are not disclosed here.
| Donor | Donations | Net |
|---|---|---|
| Aubrey Preston | 4 | $4,000.00 |
| Michelle Barrett | 2 | $2,000.00 |
| Charles Mann | 1 | $1,000.00 |
| Reese Smith | 1 | $1,000.00 |
| Jerry Matthews | 1 | $1,000.00 |
| James Dalton | 1 | $1,000.00 |
| Gaye Thomas | 1 | $1,000.00 |
| Tammy Matthews | 1 | $1,000.00 |
| Andy Brodbine | 1 | $1,000.00 |
| Megan Brodbine | 1 | $1,000.00 |
| Donor | Location | Employer | Amount | Date |
|---|
Expenditures
| Vendor | Payments | Total | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neon Marketing | 6 | $115,339.93 | |
| Yake Films LLC | 4 | $24,871.25 | |
| US Postal Service | 8 | $21,087.55 | |
| Critical Impressions | 5 | $19,880.15 | |
| Hoagland, Pam | 5 | $15,074.85 | |
| Miller, Melissa | 4 | $4,000.00 | |
| JLB Works, LLC | 3 | $3,700.00 | |
| American Mail & Insert | 1 | $3,338.31 | |
| King, Joe | 2 | $3,200.00 | |
| Davidson, Taylor | 8 | $2,971.51 | |
| Wakm Am Radio | 2 | $2,658.00 | |
| One Stop Cafe | 2 | $2,500.00 | |
| Young, Kenny | 4 | $1,587.80 | |
| Beethovens Grill | 1 | $1,255.21 | |
| Elks Lodge | 1 | $938.83 | |
| Headley, Ricky | 1 | $800.00 | |
| Brent, Josh | 1 | $800.00 | |
| Williamson Co Rec Center | 6 | $785.00 | |
| Williams, John | 2 | $506.00 | |
| Office Depot | 4 | $308.81 | |
| , | 2 | $281.02 | |
| Bellsouth | 3 | $235.34 | |
| Flying Horse Cafe | 1 | $200.00 | |
| Franklin Rotary | 1 | $100.00 | |
| Walgreens | 1 | $54.61 | |
| Nashville Republican Women | 1 | $50.00 | |
| Trees and Trends | 1 | $37.65 |
| Payee | Location | Purpose | Amount | Date |
|---|
Loans
$134,001.00 in loan principal shown. The filings date all of it to this campaign. Later reports can repeat an outstanding loan, so each reconstructed lender balance is counted once below.
Why this number?
Loan principal shown adds together the amounts listed below.
Show formula
Loan schedules can repeat an outstanding debt on later reports. This is the reconstructed principal for each lender, counted once, split between candidate or family loans and all other lenders. Repayments and outstanding balances are shown separately in the ledger.
| Candidate and family loans | $134,001 |
| Loan principal shown | $134,001 |
| Lender | Type | Received | Principal | Repaid | Outstanding |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self (Tom Neill) | Candidate loan | May 2, 2006 | $134,001.00 | $0.00 | $134,001.00 |
Where the money went Each expenditure carries a short description of what it was for, written by the campaign. We sort those descriptions into a fixed set of categories; one expenditure goes in one category, so the amounts add up to Tom Neill’s itemized spending. Descriptions that don’t clearly fit a category are counted under Other rather than guessed at.
- Advertising & media $113,595 50%
- Printing & mail $40,968 18%
- Field & voter contact $21,746 10%
- Other $21,458 9%
- Consulting & professional services $19,530 9%
- Fundraising & events $8,617 4%
- Office & operations $648 0.3%
Loans
| Lender | Amount | Date Received | Outstanding | Repaid |
|---|
Each loan shows its balance as of the candidate's most recent filing; repayments since then appear when the next report is filed.
Filing History
Totals as filed with the Tennessee Registry of Election Finance; see About for how this data is processed.