William Gary Steakley — 2010 Tennessee Senate, District 15 campaign
2010 Tennessee Senate, District 15
Final This campaign’s election cycle is closed — no further reports for it are due, so these totals are settled rather than mid-race. They cover every filing we hold for the campaign; if the source archive later adds one, we load it. Full definition → · 5 filings · Pre-General 2010–Q4 2010
Why this number?
Why this number?
Why this number?
Why this number?
Cash on hand is the amount reported on the filing listed below.
Show formula
The ending cash balance the campaign reported on its most recent filing (as filed, not computed).
- Q4 2010 Initial $69 filing-stated
Raised (cash) adds together the amounts listed below.
Show formula
Sum of every cash receipt bucket: itemized contributions from others + the candidate's own contributions + loans + filer-stated unitemized + (federal) transfers and other receipts.
| Itemized contributions from others | $2,350 |
| Loans received | $3,000 |
| Unitemized contributions (filer-stated lump sum) | $1,075 |
| Raised (cash) | $6,425 |
- Q4 2010 Initial $1,000 derived
- Pre-General 2010 Initial $1,450 mixed
- Itemized contributions from others $800 derived
- Unitemized contributions (filer-stated lump sum) $650 filing-stated
- Q3 2010 Initial $3,975 mixed
- Itemized contributions from others $1,550 derived
- Unitemized contributions (filer-stated lump sum) $425 filing-stated
- Loans $2,000 derived
Total spent adds together the amounts listed below.
Show formula
Itemized expenditure rows plus the stated spending a filer reported as a lump sum without itemizing it.
| Itemized expenditures | $4,505 |
| Stated spending not itemized (credited) | $1,851 |
| Total spent | $6,356 |
- Q4 2010 Initial $1,402 mixed
- Itemized expenditures $789 derived
- Stated spending not itemized (credited) $612 filing-stated
- Pre-General 2010 Initial $1,233 mixed
- Itemized expenditures $366 derived
- Stated spending not itemized (credited) $867 filing-stated
- Q3 2010 Initial $3,721 mixed
- Itemized expenditures $3,350 derived
- Stated spending not itemized (credited) $372 filing-stated
Out-of-state share compares itemized money from outside tennessee with raised incl. in-kind.
Show formula
Itemized contributions from a state other than Tennessee, divided by everything the campaign raised (shown only when the state of most itemized money is known — above 99% coverage).
| From outside Tennessee | $0 |
Who funds this campaign The sources split breaks down everything the campaign raised: the candidate’s own money (including self-loans), individuals (including unitemized small gifts), organizations and PACs, and “other” (in-kind contributions, loans other than the candidate’s, and the like) — open its “Why this number?” for the full breakdown. Gift-size and location figures cover itemized contributions only. Aggregates count everyone who gave, including donors below the $200 disclosure floor — a share across all donors identifies no one. Full definition →
The candidate’s own money made up 47% of the campaign’s funds — individuals gave 32%, organizations and PACs 21%.
Why this number?
Share from the candidate compares from the candidate's own money with everything the campaign raised.
Show formula
Everything the campaign raised, split into the candidate's own money (own contributions plus self- and family loans), individuals, organizations and PACs, and everything else — loans other than the candidate's, in-kind contributions, and (for federal filers) committee transfers and other receipts. Unitemized small donations count as individual money. The parts add up to the total raised. The headline share is the candidate divided by the total.
| Candidate's own money (incl. self-loans) | $3,000 |
| From individuals | $2,075 |
| From organizations and PACs | $1,350 |
Where the money comes from Shares of itemized dollars, by the contributor’s state and city as filed. A city is named only when at least 5 donors gave from it or it holds at least 5% of the located dollars; everyone else is grouped into “elsewhere.” Shown only when at least 80% of dollars carry a usable state. Full definition →
100% of located dollars came from within Tennessee (0% from out of state).
- Crossville $85036%
- Livingston $50021%
- Livington $50021%
- Byrdstown $25011%
- Sparta $25011%
Why this number?
Out-of-state share of located dollars compares itemized money from outside tennessee with itemized money with a known state.
Show formula
Itemized contribution dollars from outside Tennessee, divided by all itemized dollars whose contributor state is known. A city is named only when at least 5 donors gave from it OR it holds at least 5% of the located dollars; everyone else is grouped into elsewhere-in-Tennessee and other-out-of-state. Shown only above 99% state coverage. Based on itemized contributions only (loans and money a filer reported as an unitemized lump sum are not included).
| From outside Tennessee | $0 |
Contributions & Spending Over Time
Itemized monetary contributions and expenditures by month — Jul 2010 – Oct 2011. Peak $1,000 in Jul 2010. Spending peaked at $2,617 in Aug 2010.
Contributions
The donor total above includes everyone who gave. This table names donors whose cumulative giving reached $200.
| Donor | Donations | Net |
|---|---|---|
| Michael Cox | 1 | $500.00 |
| Beth Cox | 1 | $500.00 |
| Cumberland Co Republican Party | 1 | $300.00 |
| Cumberland Co Republican Party | 1 | $300.00 |
| Pickett Co Republican Party | 1 | $250.00 |
| Cumberland Co Republican Womens Group | 1 | $250.00 |
| White Co Republican Party | 1 | $250.00 |
| Donor | Location | Employer | Amount | Date |
|---|
Expenditures
| Vendor | Payments | Total | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Out the Door Signs | 1 | $2,616.99 | |
| Cookeville Communications Inc. | 1 | $438.00 | |
| Go Web Hosting | 1 | $260.00 | |
| Hearld Citizen Newspaper | 1 | $245.00 | |
| Thompson Clan Printing | 1 | $200.00 | |
| Thompson Clan Inc. | 1 | $200.00 | |
| Vista Printing | 1 | $165.71 | |
| Vista Printing | 1 | $165.71 | |
| Anderson Performance Printing | 1 | $107.00 | |
| Livingston Enterprises | 1 | $106.37 |
| Payee | Location | Purpose | Amount | Date |
|---|
Loans
$3,000.00 in loan principal shown. The filings date all of it to this campaign. Later reports can repeat an outstanding loan, so each reconstructed lender balance is counted once below.
Why this number?
Loan principal shown adds together the amounts listed below.
Show formula
Loan schedules can repeat an outstanding debt on later reports. This is the reconstructed principal for each lender, counted once, split between candidate or family loans and all other lenders. Repayments and outstanding balances are shown separately in the ledger.
| Candidate and family loans | $3,000 |
| Loan principal shown | $3,000 |
| Lender | Type | Received | Principal | Repaid | Outstanding |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self (William Gary Steakley) | Candidate loan | Aug 27, 2010 | $3,000.00 | $0.00 | $3,000.00 |
Where the money went Each expenditure carries a short description of what it was for, written by the campaign. We sort those descriptions into a fixed set of categories; one expenditure goes in one category, so the amounts add up to William Gary Steakley’s itemized spending. Descriptions that don’t clearly fit a category are counted under Other rather than guessed at.
- Printing & mail $3,455 77%
- Advertising & media $1,049 23%
Loans
| Lender | Amount | Date Received | Outstanding | Repaid |
|---|
Each loan shows its balance as of the candidate's most recent filing; repayments since then appear when the next report is filed.
Filing History
Totals as filed with the Tennessee Registry of Election Finance; see About for how this data is processed.