Beth Harwell — 2004 Tennessee House, District 56 campaign
2004 Tennessee House, District 56 · totals since 2003
Final This campaign’s election cycle is closed — no further reports for it are due, so these totals are settled rather than mid-race. They cover every filing we hold for the campaign; if the source archive later adds one, we load it. Full definition → · 5 filings · Early Supplemental 2003 2003–Pre-Primary 2004
Who funds this campaign The sources split breaks down the receipts the headline adds up, by the lines of each report behind it; its parts add up to the headline. Open its “Why this number?” for each report’s lines. Gift-size and location figures cover itemized contributions only. Aggregates count everyone who gave, including donors below the $200 disclosure floor — a share across all donors identifies no one. Full definition →
Largest part: organizations and PACs, itemized, 73% of receipts on these reports.
Gift size Each individual donor’s total giving to this campaign this cycle. Organizations, PACs, and the candidate’s own money are excluded (this is about people); a donor who gave under several name spellings is counted once. A donor named on the page can still sit in a small bucket — these are cycle totals, not “unnamed donors.” Full definition →
Where the money comes from Shares of itemized dollars, by the contributor’s state and city as filed. A city is named only when at least 5 donors gave from it or it holds at least 5% of the located dollars; everyone else is grouped into “elsewhere.” Shown only when at least 80% of dollars carry a usable state. Full definition →
92% of located dollars came from within Tennessee (8% from out of state).
- Nashville $29K80%
- Elsewhere in Tennessee $4K
- Other out-of-state $3K
Contributions Over Time
Itemized monetary contributions by month — Jan 2003 – Nov 2004. Peak $10,950 in Dec 2003.
Contributions
The donor total above includes everyone who gave. This table names 44 donors: organizations, and people whose cumulative giving reached $200. 4 people gave less than $200 in cash; their gifts total $500 and their names are withheld.
| Donor | Donations | Net |
|---|---|---|
| Volunteer PAC | 2 | $10,000.00 |
| Tennessee REALTORS PAC (RPAC) | 3 | $2,500.00 |
| Doug Smith | 1 | $2,000.00 |
| Tennessee Bankers Association PAC | 1 | $1,500.00 |
| Tennessee Medical Association PAC (TMA) | 2 | $1,250.00 |
| Justin P Wilson | 2 | $1,250.00 |
| Housing Industry PAC | 1 | $1,000.00 |
| Tennessee Nurses PAC | 3 | $1,000.00 |
| Lawyers Involved for TN PAC | 1 | $1,000.00 |
| Benjamin Ernest | 2 | $1,000.00 |
| Donor | Location | Employer | Amount | Date |
|---|
Expenditures
| Vendor | Payments | Total | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Majority Strategies | 1 | $6,300.30 | |
| The Lukens Company | 1 | $4,815.00 | |
| Aristotle | 1 | $2,500.00 | |
| Goins, Mark | 1 | $1,000.00 | |
| Tracy, Jim | 1 | $250.00 | |
| IRS | 1 | $150.00 |
| Payee | Location | Purpose | Amount | Date |
|---|
Where the money went Each expenditure carries a short description of what it was for, written by the campaign. We sort those descriptions into a fixed set of categories; one expenditure goes in one category, so the amounts add up to Beth Harwell’s itemized spending. Descriptions that don’t clearly fit a category are counted under Other rather than guessed at.
- Printing & mail $11,115 74%
- Office & operations $2,650 18%
- Contributions & donations $1,250 8%
Filing History
Totals as filed with the Tennessee Registry of Election Finance; see About for how this data is processed.
| Filing | Cash Beginning | Cash Ending | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Post-General 2004 2004 | $60,806.34 | $61,228.34 | Source: Post-General 2004 2004 filing Report 2926 |
| Post-Primary 2004 2004 Amended | $56,234.52 | $60,676.19 | Source: Post-Primary 2004 2004 filing Report 1649 |
| Pre-General 2004 | $60,676.19 | $60,806.34 | Source: Pre-General 2004 filing Report 2482 |
| Pre-Primary 2004 Amended | $53,580.46 | $56,234.52 | Source: Pre-Primary 2004 filing Report 1364 |
| Early Supplemental 2003 2003 | $38,732.16 | $53,580.46 | Source: Early Supplemental 2003 2003 filing Report 306 |