Jim Hackworth — 2006 Tennessee House, District 33 campaign
2006 Tennessee House, District 33 · totals since 2005
Final This campaign’s election cycle is closed — no further reports for it are due, so these totals are settled rather than mid-race. They cover every filing we hold for the campaign; if the source archive later adds one, we load it. Full definition → · 7 filings · Supplemental 2005 2005–Q4 2006
Who funds this campaign The sources split breaks down the receipts the headline adds up, by the lines of each report behind it; its parts add up to the headline. Open its “Why this number?” for each report’s lines. Gift-size and location figures cover itemized contributions only. Aggregates count everyone who gave, including donors below the $200 disclosure floor — a share across all donors identifies no one. Full definition →
Largest part: organizations and PACs, itemized, 47% of receipts on these reports.
Loans, interest and other receipts, net of refunds: −$220. Shares are of the $79,336 before it.
Gift size Each individual donor’s total giving to this campaign this cycle. Organizations, PACs, and the candidate’s own money are excluded (this is about people); a donor who gave under several name spellings is counted once. A donor named on the page can still sit in a small bucket — these are cycle totals, not “unnamed donors.” Full definition →
Where the money comes from Shares of itemized dollars, by the contributor’s state and city as filed. A city is named only when at least 5 donors gave from it or it holds at least 5% of the located dollars; everyone else is grouped into “elsewhere.” Shown only when at least 80% of dollars carry a usable state. Full definition →
93% of located dollars came from within Tennessee (7% from out of state).
- Nashville $26K36%
- Clinton $19K27%
- Oak Ridge $8K10%
- Knoxville $2K3%
- Elsewhere in Tennessee $12K
- Other out-of-state $5K
Contributions & Spending Over Time
Itemized monetary contributions and expenditures by month — Aug 2004 – Jan 2007. Peak $23,375 in Sep 2006. Spending peaked at $54,944 in Oct 2006.
Contributions
The donor total above includes everyone who gave. This table names 131 donors: organizations, and people whose cumulative giving reached $200. 36 people gave less than $200 in cash; their gifts total $3,434 and their names are withheld.
| Donor | Donations | Net |
|---|---|---|
| Tennessee Democratic Party In-Kind | 3 | $20,660.12 |
| Lawyers Involved for TN PAC | 2 | $3,500.00 |
| The Speaker S Fund PAC | 2 | $3,000.00 |
| Concerned Automotive Retailers PAC | 4 | $2,500.00 |
| Service Employees Local 205 Cope Acct PAC | 2 | $2,000.00 |
| Joseph Hollingsworth | 2 | $2,000.00 |
| Tennessee Bankers Association PAC | 2 | $1,500.00 |
| Tennessee REALTORS PAC (RPAC) | 2 | $1,500.00 |
| Meredith Flitcroft Normand Joyce | 2 | $1,500.00 |
| Bob Gilliam | 2 | $1,500.00 |
| Donor | Location | Employer | Amount | Date |
|---|
Expenditures
| Vendor | Payments | Total | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Strategy Group Inc. | 2 | $46,427.02 | |
| Comcast Spotlight | 1 | $9,562.50 | |
| Ridder/Braden,Inc. | 1 | $4,512.50 | |
| Bridge Communications | 1 | $4,056.25 | |
| The Oak Ridger | 11 | $3,999.10 | |
| Direct Mail Services | 2 | $2,755.26 | |
| Southern Nameplate & Graphics Inc. | 1 | $2,510.65 | |
| E Allan Brandon LLC | 1 | $2,356.00 | |
| Lamar Advertising Company | 1 | $2,300.00 | |
| C&D Desktop Publishing and Printing | 5 | $1,790.43 | |
| Oak Ridge Observer | 4 | $1,371.50 | |
| Bell South | 2 | $1,357.24 | |
| WYSH 1380 | 3 | $1,221.00 | |
| Clinton Courier News | 6 | $1,171.97 | |
| Vital Visuals | 1 | $1,145.00 | |
| Direct Connect | 2 | $1,141.80 | |
| Museum of Appalachia | 1 | $1,125.00 | |
| Hewitt, Margaret | 1 | $1,040.00 | |
| The Norris Bulletin | 1 | $440.00 | |
| Political Usa | 1 | $362.97 | |
| BBB Communications | 1 | $250.00 | |
| Anderson County Visions Magazine | 2 | $243.00 | |
| Norris Lions Club | 3 | $238.00 | |
| Anderson County Quaterback Club | 1 | $225.00 | |
| Clinton Football Booster Club | 1 | $150.00 | |
| Wildcat Football Booster Club | 1 | $135.00 | |
| Price-Rite Company | 1 | $120.15 | |
| Computer Soluntions of Tennessee | 2 | $38.36 |
| Payee | Location | Purpose | Amount | Date |
|---|
Loans
$16,000.00 in loan balances shown. The filings date all of it to this campaign. Later reports can repeat an outstanding loan, so each reconstructed lender balance is counted once below.
| Lender | Type | Received | Balance shown | Repaid | Outstanding |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self (Jim Hackworth) | Candidate loan | — | $16,000.00 | $0.00 | $16,000.00 |
Where the money went Each expenditure carries a short description of what it was for, written by the campaign. We sort those descriptions into a fixed set of categories; one expenditure goes in one category, so the amounts add up to Jim Hackworth’s itemized spending. Descriptions that don’t clearly fit a category are counted under Other rather than guessed at.
- Printing & mail $60,379 66%
- Advertising & media $21,307 23%
- Consulting & professional services $7,317 8%
- Office & operations $1,918 2%
- Fundraising & events $1,125 1%
Loans
| Lender | Amount | Date Received | Outstanding | Repaid |
|---|
Each loan shows its balance as of the candidate's most recent filing; repayments since then appear when the next report is filed.
Filing History
Totals as filed with the Tennessee Registry of Election Finance; see About for how this data is processed.
| Filing | Cash Beginning | Cash Ending | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q4 2006 Amended | $21,721.45 | $11,093.62 | Source: Q4 2006 filing Report 12972 |
| Pre-General 2006 | $59,993.62 | $21,721.45 | Source: Pre-General 2006 filing Report 10820 |
| Q3 2006 Amended | $44,335.11 | $59,993.62 | Source: Q3 2006 filing Report 10705 |
| Pre-Primary 2006 Amended | $43,430.11 | $44,335.11 | Source: Pre-Primary 2006 filing Report 9119 |
| Q2 2006 | $61,275.76 | $43,430.11 | Source: Q2 2006 filing Report 7036 |
| Q1 2006 | $65,332.01 | $61,275.76 | Source: Q1 2006 filing Report 6103 |
| Supplemental 2005 2005 Amended | $39,253.68 | $65,332.01 | Source: Supplemental 2005 2005 filing Report 5781 |