Memphis

Ward Crutchfield — 2004 Tennessee Senate, District 10 campaign

Tennessee Senate, District 10 Democratic

2004 Tennessee Senate, District 10 · totals since 2003

Final This campaign’s election cycle is closed — no further reports for it are due, so these totals are settled rather than mid-race. They cover every filing we hold for the campaign; if the source archive later adds one, we load it. Full definition → · 5 filings · Early Supplemental 2003 2003–Pre-Primary 2004

Ended With What was left in the campaign’s account when its reporting closed — the ending balance on its final report for this race. It is a leftover, not a war chest: money still to be spent, refunded, given away, or carried into the next campaign. Full definition →
$211,060
as of the Post-General 2004 report
Receipts The sum of Total Receipts on the selected published reports. Open the receipt to check each report and any exclusions. Full definition →
$165,728
includes $12,180 in small gifts the filer reported as a lump sum
Itemized in-kind Goods or services donated to the campaign instead of cash — say, free printing or donated consulting — reported at fair-market value. Counted toward the same $200 disclosure threshold as cash gifts. This figure adds the in-kind contributions itemized on the selected reports. The Registry reports in-kind apart from receipts, so it is not part of the receipts figure. Full definition →
$1,479
goods or services itemized on these reports
Total Spent
$94,722
Donors
194
total donors; qualifying names are listed below

Cash on hand is the amount reported on the filing listed below.

Show formula

The ending cash balance the campaign reported on its most recent filing (as filed, not computed). Another report, Post-Primary 2004 2004, gives the same end date and states $216,289.24.

Reported on this filing:

Reported receipts adds together the amounts listed below.

Show formula

Sum of Total Receipts reported on the selected source reports.

Inputs behind Reported receipts
Post-General 2004 2004 reported receipts $5,566
Post-Primary 2004 2004 reported receipts $15,152
Pre-General 2004 reported receipts $34,617
Pre-Primary 2004 reported receipts $32,488
Early Supplemental 2003 2003 reported receipts $77,905
Reported receipts $165,728
From each filing:
Show 1 more filing

Total spent adds together the amounts listed below.

Show formula

Itemized expenditure rows plus the stated spending a filer reported as a lump sum without itemizing it.

Inputs behind Total spent
Itemized expenditures $84,860
Stated spending not itemized (credited) $9,863
Total spent $94,722
From each filing:
  • Post-General 2004 2004 Amendment $17,483 mixed
    • Itemized expenditures $15,780 derived
    • Stated spending not itemized (credited) $1,704 filing-stated
  • Post-Primary 2004 2004 Amendment $6,499 mixed
    • Itemized expenditures $5,873 derived
    • Stated spending not itemized (credited) $626 filing-stated
  • Pre-General 2004 Amendment $27,929 mixed
    • Itemized expenditures $26,967 derived
    • Stated spending not itemized (credited) $963 filing-stated
  • Pre-Primary 2004 Amendment $23,026 mixed
    • Itemized expenditures $20,213 derived
    • Stated spending not itemized (credited) $2,814 filing-stated
Show 1 more filing
  • Early Supplemental 2003 2003 Amendment $19,785 mixed
    • Itemized expenditures $16,028 derived
    • Stated spending not itemized (credited) $3,756 filing-stated
Receipts
$165,728
Spent
$94,722

Who funds this campaign The sources split breaks down the receipts the headline adds up, by the lines of each report behind it; its parts add up to the headline. Open its “Why this number?” for each report’s lines. Gift-size and location figures cover itemized contributions only. Aggregates count everyone who gave, including donors below the $200 disclosure floor — a share across all donors identifies no one. Full definition →

Largest part: organizations and PACs, itemized, 56% of receipts on these reports.

Individuals, itemized $58K · 35%Organizations and PACs, itemized $92K · 56%Unitemized contributions $12K · 7%Loans, interest and other receipts, net of refunds $4K · 2%

Share of reported receipts: Organizations and PACs, itemized compares organizations and pacs, itemized with reported receipts.

Show formula

Each selected report's reported receipts split by the report's own lines; the parts of every report add up to its total, and the totals to the headline.

Organizations and PACs, itemized: $92,050 ÷ Reported receipts: $165,728
Inputs behind Share of reported receipts: Organizations and PACs, itemized
Individuals, itemized $57,950
Organizations and PACs, itemized $92,050
Unitemized contributions $12,180
Loans, interest and other receipts, net of refunds $3,548
From each filing:
Show 1 more filing

Gift size Each individual donor’s total giving to this campaign this cycle. Organizations, PACs, and the candidate’s own money are excluded (this is about people); a donor who gave under several name spellings is counted once. A donor named on the page can still sit in a small bucket — these are cycle totals, not “unnamed donors.” Full definition →

$491average gift
$275median gift
118individual donors
Share of donors Share of dollars
Under $50
0%
0%
$50–200
8%
3%
$200–1K
73%
51%
$1K–5K
19%
47%
$5K+
0%
0%

Average gift per individual donor compares total from individual donors with individual donors.

Show formula

Every individual donor's total contributions to this campaign, divided by the number of individual donors. Organizations and PACs are excluded (this measures people); a donor who gave under several name spellings is counted once. The median and the gift-size buckets are computed over the same individual-donor totals. Based on itemized contributions only (loans and money a filer reported as an unitemized lump sum are not included).

Total from individual donors: $57,950 ÷ Individual donors: 118
Inputs behind Average gift per individual donor
Total from individual donors $57,950
Median gift $275
Individual donors 118
Source filings:

Where the money comes from Shares of itemized dollars, by the contributor’s state and city as filed. A city is named only when at least 5 donors gave from it or it holds at least 5% of the located dollars; everyone else is grouped into “elsewhere.” Shown only when at least 80% of dollars carry a usable state. Full definition →

95% of located dollars came from within Tennessee (5% from out of state).

Tennessee $141,975 Out of state $8,025
  • Nashville $70K47%
  • Chattanooga $30K20%
  • Murfreesboro $10K7%
  • Signal Mountain $8K5%
  • Lookout Mountain $3K2%
  • Elsewhere in Tennessee $21K
  • Other out-of-state $8K

Out-of-state share of located dollars compares itemized money from outside tennessee with itemized money with a known state.

Show formula

Itemized contribution dollars from outside Tennessee, divided by all itemized dollars whose contributor state is known. A city is named only when at least 5 donors gave from it OR it holds at least 5% of the located dollars; everyone else is grouped into elsewhere-in-Tennessee and other-out-of-state. Shown only above 99% state coverage. Based on itemized contributions only (loans and money a filer reported as an unitemized lump sum are not included).

Itemized money from outside Tennessee: $8,025 ÷ Itemized money with a known state: $150,000
Inputs behind Out-of-state share of located dollars
From outside Tennessee $8,025
Source filings:

Contributions & Spending Over Time

Itemized monetary contributions and expenditures by month — Jan 2003 – Dec 2004. Peak $31,000 in Oct 2004. Spending peaked at $24,448 in Sep 2004.

Cash contributions Spent

Contributions

The donor total above includes everyone who gave. This table names 186 donors: organizations, and people whose cumulative giving reached $200. 10 people gave less than $200 in cash; their gifts total $1,450 and their names are withheld.

186 named donors 242 donations

Campaign contributions consolidated by donor, ranked by net amount
Donor Donations Net
Lawyers Involved for TN PAC 3 $9,000.00
Nat L Health Corp PAC 2 $8,500.00
Tennessee Employees Action Movement PAC 3 $7,500.00
Plumbers Pipefitters Education Committee 1 $6,000.00
Tennessee Optometrists PAC 3 $4,500.00
Tennessee Educ Assn Fund for Children Public Edu 3 $3,500.00
Tennessee Afl Cio Labor Committee Includes In-Kind 3 $3,360.00
Tennessee Health Care Assn PAC 1 $3,000.00
Tennessee REALTORS PAC (RPAC) 3 $3,000.00
Housing Industry PAC 2 $2,500.00

Expenditures

79 vendors 119 payments

Campaign payments consolidated by vendor, ranked by total
Vendor Payments Total Share
Connell Communications 2 $13,450.00 16%
Tennessee Democratic Party 3 $12,000.00 14%
Senate Democratic Caucus 1 $10,000.00 12%
T. E. Properties 2 $4,125.00 5%
Dixie Souvenirs 4 $3,634.94 4%
Chattanooga Choo Choo 1 $2,607.31 3%
Johnson, Linda 3 $1,881.92 2%
Venture Printing 2 $1,682.45 2%
Chatanooga Florist 4 $1,564.68 2%
Crutchfield, Ward 2 $1,545.39 2%

Where the money went Each expenditure carries a short description of what it was for, written by the campaign. We sort those descriptions into a fixed set of categories; one expenditure goes in one category, so the amounts add up to Ward Crutchfield’s itemized spending. Descriptions that don’t clearly fit a category are counted under Other rather than guessed at.

  • Contributions & donations $34,257 40%
  • Other $32,290 38%
  • Fundraising & events $6,910 8%
  • Office & operations $5,518 7%
  • Printing & mail $4,006 5%
  • Advertising & media $1,880 2%

Filing History

Totals as filed with the Tennessee Registry of Election Finance; see About for how this data is processed.

Campaign filing history
Filing Cash Beginning Cash Ending Source
Post-General 2004 2004 Amended $222,977.01 $211,059.56 Source: Post-General 2004 2004 filing Report 5142
Post-Primary 2004 2004 Amended $207,635.82 $216,289.24 Source: Post-Primary 2004 2004 filing Report 2237
Pre-General 2004 Amended $216,289.24 $222,977.01 Source: Pre-General 2004 filing Report 5233
Pre-Primary 2004 Amended $198,174.34 $207,635.82 Source: Pre-Primary 2004 filing Report 2262
Early Supplemental 2003 2003 Amended $140,054.09 $198,174.34 Source: Early Supplemental 2003 2003 filing Report 2264